Rebel Shiv Sena MLA Eknath Shinde has written a letter to Maharashtra Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray Home Minister and DGP regarding withdrawal of security to the families of 38 MLAs. In this letter, he has made a big allegation on Uddhav Thackeray.
New Delhi, ANI. Shiv Sena’s rebel MLA Eknath Shinde has written a letter to Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray, Maharashtra Home Minister and DGP Maharashtra regarding withdrawal of security to the family members of 38 MLAs. He tweeted that the security of Shiv Sena MLAs has been withdrawn by the orders of the Chief Minister and the Home Minister. It is the responsibility of the government to protect them and their families.
Home Minister called the allegations baseless
Maharashtra Home Minister Dilip Walse Patil said that neither the Chief Minister nor the Home Department has given orders to withdraw the security of any MLA. The allegations being made through Twitter are false and completely baseless.
‘Security like you can’t be given to family members’
Shiv Sena leader Sanjay Raut reacted to Eknath Shinde’s letter on withdrawal of security of family members of 38 MLAs. He said, ‘You are an MLA, so you have been provided security. Your family members cannot be given the same security as you.
Uddhav Thackeray and Eknath Shinde will meet today
- The political crisis in Maharashtra is increasing continuously.
- While Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray has called a meeting of the party’s national executive at 1 pm, Eknath Shinde has also called a meeting of rebel MLAs at 2 pm in Guwahati, the capital of Assam.
- The meeting will be held at Radisson Blu Hotel.
Shinde will go to High Court
On the other hand, the Maharashtra Deputy Speaker has rejected the recognition of Eknath Shinde as the leader of the Shiv Sena Legislature Party and the appointment of the Chief Whip. Now Shinde will go to the Bombay High Court against this decision. He will file a petition in this regard. Shinde has claimed that he has the support of more than two-thirds of Shiv Sena MLAs. The decision of the Vice President in this regard is unconstitutional.